Choose the evidence before the format
Start by deciding what a student should demonstrate. A quick recall check, an explanation of reasoning and a practical demonstration may call for different formats. Use this list as a planning reference when choosing a format for your class.
Formats can be combined. A multiple-choice item followed by a short explanation can reveal more than the selected option alone. Avoid variety for its own sake: each part should earn its place in the task.
Quick checks
- Multiple choice — select one answer, then explain why it fits.
- Multiple select — identify all correct options and discuss the selection rule.
- True or false with justification — support the decision with a reason.
- Numerical response — provide a value, unit and an appropriate level of precision.
- Fill in a blank — complete a statement where the missing term matters.
- Short response — answer a focused question in a sentence or two.
Organising ideas
- Matching — connect terms, examples or relationships.
- Ordering — arrange steps in a meaningful sequence.
- Classification — group examples and explain the rule used.
- Table completion — organise missing values or observations.
- Timeline construction — place events and explain important intervals.
- Concept map — show and explain relationships between ideas.
Working with sources
- Source comparison — identify agreement and disagreement between sources.
- Image interpretation — explain what a visual does and does not establish.
- Graph interpretation — describe a pattern and relate it to the axes.
- Data comparison — use values to support a conclusion.
- Quotation analysis — explain how specific wording contributes to meaning.
- Case study — apply ideas to a described situation.
Making reasoning visible
- Worked solution — show the steps as well as the result.
- Error analysis — identify and correct a mistaken approach.
- Estimate and justify — give a reasonable approximation and assumptions.
- Prediction — explain an expected result before checking it.
- Hypothesis — propose a testable relationship between variables.
- Analogy — explain where a comparison is useful and where it breaks down.
Extended thinking
- Analytical paragraph — connect a claim to evidence and explanation.
- Argumentative essay — develop and support a sustained position.
- Comparative response — compare using a clear basis rather than two separate summaries.
- Model evaluation — test a representation against its purpose and limitations.
- Design proposal — explain how a solution addresses specified constraints.
- Evidence-based recommendation — weigh alternatives before recommending an action.
Performance and reflection
- Oral explanation — explain reasoning aloud and respond to questions.
- Practical demonstration — show a skill using an appropriate observation checklist.
- Annotated diagram — add labels and explanations that reveal understanding.
- Portfolio selection — justify why chosen work demonstrates progress.
- Self-assessment — compare work with criteria and identify a next step.
- Peer feedback — give specific feedback against an agreed focus.
Review access and marking expectations
Before using a format, check the language, presentation, devices and response method students need. Make the marking criteria clear and consider whether the format measures the intended learning or adds an unrelated barrier.
For open responses, plan for reasonable alternatives. For objective items, check that the correct answer and scoring rule are unambiguous. Use the GoHiMark example library to explore a small selection of original prompts and answer notes.
Further reading
These sources offer further context. Links do not imply endorsement of GoHiMark.
Explore the question examples or estimate a task with the marking workload planner.