Learning & feedback

Adaptive learning: what teachers should ask before a pilot

Understand how adaptive practice is presented, what its estimates mean and how to evaluate a classroom use case.

What makes a practice sequence adaptive?

An adaptive practice system changes what a learner sees in response to information such as previous answers. The proposed next step might be a different question, a reminder or practice on a related concept.

The useful question is not simply whether the system adapts. Ask what information it uses, how the decision is made and whether the teacher can understand and change it.

An estimate is not a diagnosis

A progress score is an estimate based on the information the system has received. An incorrect answer may reflect a knowledge gap, unfamiliar wording, a careless slip or an access barrier. One number cannot explain all those possibilities.

A teacher should be able to inspect the responses behind a recommendation. Ask how the system handles sparse data, guessing, missing answers and a student who improves after classroom instruction.

Connect practice to the actual course

Check that the questions and any proposed prerequisite relationships make sense for the learning being taught. Ask a provider to show a concrete example of how a response changes the next task.

Curriculum labels do not establish that a sequence is appropriate for every student. Compare the recommendation with the student’s classroom work and the teacher’s knowledge of the course.

Plan a small, observable evaluation

Choose a defined unit and a manageable group. Decide what you will examine before starting, then record both student and teacher experience.

  • Whether the recommended tasks are relevant and understandable.
  • Whether teachers can inspect and override recommendations.
  • Whether access needs are supported in the actual workflow.
  • How much setup and review time the approach takes.
  • What evidence would justify continuing, changing or stopping the pilot.

Separate a demonstration from an outcome claim

A moving chart or a personalised question sequence is not evidence of improved learning. Ask for evaluation methods and context before accepting claims about achievement gains or weeks to mastery.

GoHiMark’s public preview does not run an adaptive student service. Its question examples and guides support planning conversations; any future adaptive feature needs separate evaluation in its intended setting.

Further reading

These sources offer further context. Links do not imply endorsement of GoHiMark.

Put an idea into practice

Explore the question examples or estimate a task with the marking workload planner.